Like the shift from wired to wireless, it’s hard to go back after you’ve experienced 1000Hz vs 125Hz.
Without getting too lost in the details of the debate, as long as your CPU isn’t completely ancient, higher polling rates don’t have any disclaimers to offer, and the speedier positional reporting rate (1ms for 1000Hz vs 8ms for 125Hz) results in in-game accuracy that feels better.Įven for everyday computing, especially for people like me who use multiple monitors (I have three), higher polling rates helps with fast-movement accuracy across active windows spread across multiple monitors.
Now, this is an area that has long been debated, particularly among shooter fans, but as someone who considers 500Hz to be the minimum of what feels perceivably responsive for shooters, 125Hz is concerning for me. The other compromise for reaching that 400+ hours of battery life is enabling this battery-saving mode also drops the polling rate from 1000Hz to 125Hz.
0 kommentar(er)
